Lesson 2 · 30 min

The glass pH electrode and ion-selective electrodes

Why does a thin glass membrane respond to H⁺? Two-point calibration, slope efficiency, sodium and acid errors — and the LaF₃ electrode with TISAB that measures fluoride in drinking water.

In this lesson

  • Explain why a glass electrode gives a Nernstian response to H⁺ and how a combination electrode is built
  • Calibrate a pH meter with two buffers, compute the slope efficiency and judge when to recalibrate or replace the electrode
  • Use the Nikolsky–Eisenman equation to explain the sodium error and the selectivity coefficients of ion-selective electrodes
  • Design a fluoride-electrode measurement: why TISAB is added and at what pH to measure

Dip a pH meter into a mixture of 0.10 M NaOH and 0.90 M NaCl and the display says 11.0 — yet the solution’s pH is 13.0. The meter is not broken and the buffers have not expired; the glass membrane has been fooled by a flood of NaX+\ce{Na+}. The glass electrode is the most widely used chemical sensor in the world, with millions of measurements a day relying on it. Knowing how it works and when it goes wrong underpins every pH measurement.

Predict first

A glass electrode’s real slope is only 95 % of the theoretical value. You “calibrate” only the zero with the pH 7.00 buffer, and the meter assumes a 100 % slope. Measuring a sample of true pH 4.00, what does it show?

Pick an answer and lock it in before you look. A wrong guess teaches more than no guess.

How the glass membrane senses H⁺

The sensing part of a pH electrode is a thin glass bulb about 0.1 mm thick. Glass is a network of silicate tetrahedra whose negative charges are balanced by cations such as NaX+\ce{Na+} and LiX+\ce{Li+}. The inner and outer surfaces carry hydrated gel layers tens of nanometres thick, where Si−OX−\ce{Si-O-} sites exchange with HX+\ce{H+} from the solution: the more acidic the outside, the more HX+\ce{H+} binds there, and a potential difference builds across the membrane. Inside the glass, NaX+\ce{Na+} carries the current; HX+\ce{H+} itself never crosses.

The bulb holds a chloride buffer of fixed pH and an Ag/AgCl internal reference wire; a combination electrode also packs the external reference (another Ag/AgCl with KCl filling) into the same body. The electrode’s potential is a straight line in sample pH with a slope close to the Nernst slope and an intercept (the zero point, or asymmetry potential) that varies between electrodes and drifts with use — which is why it must be calibrated with buffers every time.

E=E0−β RTln⁡10F (pH−7)β=measured slope59.16 mV (25 ∘C)E = E_0 - \beta\,\frac{RT\ln 10}{F}\,(\mathrm{pH} - 7)\qquad \beta = \frac{\text{measured slope}}{59.16\ \text{mV}}\ (25\ ^\circ\text{C})
Two-point calibration fixes E₀ (the potential at pH 7) and the slope efficiency β. A good electrode has β between 95 and 102 % and a zero within ±30 mV.
E0E_0
zero point: electrode potential at pH 7
β\beta
electromotive efficiency (slope per cent)
RTln⁡10/FRT\ln10/F
Nernst slope, 59.16 mV at 25 °C

Calibrate properly: use two (or three) buffers that bracket the sample — 7.00 and 4.01 for acidic samples, 7.00 and 10.01 for basic ones; rinse with distilled water and blot between solutions; wait for a stable reading; keep samples and buffers at the same temperature or use automatic temperature compensation. With one buffer only, the meter can only assume a 100 % slope, and the error grows with distance from the calibration point.

Selectivity: the Nikolsky–Eisenman equation

No electrode responds to one ion alone. When [HX+][\ce{H+}] is tiny and [NaX+][\ce{Na+}] large, NaX+\ce{Na+} takes over the exchange sites, the electrode mistakes it for HX+\ce{H+} and reads low — the alkaline (sodium) error. In very strong acid the membrane’s response saturates and it reads high — the acid error.

The Nikolsky–Eisenman equation converts each interfering ion j into an “equivalent” amount of the measured ion: the smaller KijK_{ij}, the more selective the electrode. General-purpose glass has KHX+,NaX+K_{\ce{H+},\ce{Na+}} near 10⁻¹¹, which gives an error of about −1 unit at pH 12 in 1 M NaX+\ce{Na+}; lithium-based “low-sodium-error” glass cuts it below 0.1.

E=const+β RTln⁡10ziF lg⁡ ⁣(ai+∑jKij aj zi/zj)E = \text{const} + \beta\,\frac{RT\ln 10}{z_iF}\,\lg\!\left(a_i + \sum_j K_{ij}\,a_j^{\,z_i/z_j}\right)
The Nikolsky–Eisenman equation. For an anion electrode such as F⁻, z is negative and the potential falls as the activity rises.
ai,zia_i, z_i
activity and charge of the measured ion
aj,zja_j, z_j
activity and charge of an interfering ion
KijK_{ij}
selectivity coefficient; smaller is better
Nikolsky–Eisenman: E = E° + (s/z)·lg(aᵢ + Σ Kᵢⱼ·aⱼ^(zᵢ/zⱼ))

Ion-selective electrodes: selectivity and its limits

Na⁺ in the sample
acid error alkaline (sodium) error 02468101214True pH02468101214pH the electrode reports
  • Ideal response
  • Na⁺ 0 M
  • Na⁺ 0.1 M
  • Na⁺ 1 M
True pH of the sample
12.00
Displayed
10.96
Error
−1.04
Both electrodes follow the Nikolsky–Eisenman equation. Glass: K(H⁺, Na⁺) = 10⁻¹¹ (general-purpose glass) or 10⁻¹³·⁵ (lithium glass), typical magnitudes; the acid error is an illustrative saturation of the membrane response, a/(1 + a/3), not a mechanism. Fluoride: K(F⁻, OH⁻) = 0.1 (Harris); the free-F⁻ fraction comes from the acid–base kernel with pKa(HF) = 3.17; a background of 5 × 10⁻⁷ M leached from the crystal sets the detection limit (illustrative); the potential zero is arbitrary. Activities are taken as concentrations — in practice TISAB fixes the ionic strength so the activity coefficients are the same in standards and samples.
Glass: drag the true pH to 12 and compare the display with 0, 0.1 and 1 M Na⁺; then try the low-sodium glass. Switch to fluoride: lower the pH from 5.5 to 3 (F⁻ becomes HF), raise it to 12 (OH⁻ interferes), and push the concentration below 10⁻⁶ M to see where the response leaves the Nernst line.

Ion-selective electrodes swap the glass for a membrane sensitive to another ion: a single crystal of LaFX3\ce{LaF3} doped with EuFX2\ce{EuF2} for FX−\ce{F-}; a pressed AgX2S\ce{Ag2S} pellet for AgX+\ce{Ag+} and SX2−\ce{S^2-}; a PVC membrane holding valinomycin for KX+\ce{K+} (selectivity against NaX+\ce{Na+} about 10⁻⁴); a gas-permeable membrane over a pH electrode for COX2\ce{CO2} and NHX3\ce{NH3}. The NaX+\ce{Na+}, KX+\ce{K+}, CaX2+\ce{Ca^2+} and ClX−\ce{Cl-} results of a clinical blood-gas analyser are measured this way.

The fluoride electrode suffers almost only from OHX−\ce{OH-} (KFX−,OHX−≈0.1K_{\ce{F-},\ce{OH-}} \approx 0.1), but the sample pH must be right: below pH 5 fluoride is protonated to HF (pKaK_\mathrm{a} 3.17) and the electrode cannot see it; above pH 8 hydroxide impersonates fluoride. So samples are mixed 1 : 1 with total ionic strength adjustment buffer (TISAB): concentrated NaCl fixes the ionic strength (so standards and samples share activity coefficients), an acetate buffer holds pH 5–5.5, and CDTA frees fluoride bound to AlX3+\ce{Al^3+} and FeX3+\ce{Fe^3+}.

Worked example

Fluoride in drinking water with an ISE

Three fluoride standards (mixed 1 : 1 with TISAB like the sample) read +127.0 mV at 1.00×10−51.00\times10^{-5} M, +68.2 mV at 1.00×10−41.00\times10^{-4} M and +9.4 mV at 1.00×10−31.00\times10^{-3} M. A water sample reads +80.5 mV. Find its fluoride concentration in mg/L.

Concept check

A sample is expected to be near pH 9.3. Which two buffers should you calibrate with?

Try the calculation

Two-point calibration: the pH 7.00 buffer reads −3.5 mV and the pH 4.01 buffer +168.4 mV (25 °C). What is the electrode’s slope efficiency in per cent?

%

Key takeaways

  • A glass electrode’s potential is linear in pH with a slope near 59.16 mV (25 °C); its zero and slope vary, so it must be calibrated with buffers.
  • Two-point calibrations must bracket the sample; a slope efficiency of 95–102 % and a zero within ±30 mV are normal.
  • Nikolsky–Eisenman: interferents count as KijajK_{ij}a_j; at high pH and high NaX+\ce{Na+} the alkaline error appears.
  • Fluoride electrodes are used in TISAB at pH 5–5.5, avoiding HF formation and OHX−\ce{OH-} interference and fixing the ionic strength.
Progress is stored only in this browser and never uploaded.

Data and references

  1. D. C. Harris, Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 9th ed. (2016), Ch. 15 (the glass electrode, errors in pH measurement, ion-selective electrodes).
  2. R. P. Buck et al., “Measurement of pH. Definition, standards, and procedures (IUPAC Recommendations 2002)”, Pure Appl. Chem. 74, 2169–2200 (2002).
  3. R. G. Bates, Determination of pH: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. (Wiley, 1973).
  4. Y. Umezawa, P. Bühlmann, K. Umezawa, K. Tohda, S. Amemiya, “Potentiometric selectivity coefficients of ion-selective electrodes”, Pure Appl. Chem. 72, 1851–2082 (2000).
  5. M. S. Frant, J. W. Ross, “Electrode for sensing fluoride ion activity in solution”, Science 154, 1553–1555 (1966).
  6. WHO, Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. (2017): fluoride 1.5 mg/L; GB 5749-2022, Standards for drinking water quality: fluoride 1.0 mg/L.