Lesson 6 · 35 min
Qualitative analysis of cations
String every equilibrium so far into one flowchart: hydrochloric acid brings down silver, lead and mercury(I); sodium hydroxide and ammonia then sort copper, iron, aluminium and zinc for confirmation.
In this lesson
- Explain the “separate into groups, then confirm” logic of qualitative analysis, and the difference between group and confirmatory reagents
- Justify every step of the scheme with Ksp values, formation constants and amphoterism
- Deduce which cations an unknown contains from a set of observations
- Recognize the interferences and limits of the scheme
Before spectrometers were everywhere, chemists could name the metals in a rock or a water sample with a rack of test tubes and a dozen reagent bottles. Instruments are far faster today, yet qualitative analysis remains a classic of chemistry teaching — because every step is an equilibrium from the last few lessons: solubility products decide what precipitates, formation constants decide what redissolves, and pH decides which side amphoteric hydroxides take. This lesson strings them into one flowchart.
Predict first
Adding 6 M hydrochloric acid to an unknown gives a white precipitate. What can you conclude?
Pick an answer and lock it in before you look. A wrong guess teaches more than no guess.
Separate into groups, then confirm
With many ions present, a single reagent often throws down several precipitates at once, each masking the others. Qualitative analysis therefore works in two stages:
- a group reagent sorts the ions by solubility — hydrochloric acid, for example, precipitates only the three group I chlorides;
- within each group the ions are separated further, and each is finally confirmed by a specific, eye-catching confirmatory test.
The scheme here handles seven cations: the chloride group (, , ) and , , and , separated with sodium hydroxide and ammonia.
| Step | Operation | Why it works | Positive result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Add 6 M HCl | Tiny Ksp of AgCl, PbCl₂, Hg₂Cl₂ | white precipitate (group I) |
| 2–3 | Hot water, then K₂CrO₄ | PbCl₂ is about 3× more soluble hot | yellow PbCrO₄ → Pb²⁺ |
| 4 | 6 M NH₃ on the residue | K = 3 × 10⁻³ for AgCl + 2NH₃; Hg₂Cl₂ disproportionates | grey-black residue → Hg₂²⁺ |
| 5 | Acidify the ammonia extract | NH₃ is neutralized and AgCl returns | white AgCl → Ag⁺ |
| 6 | Add H₂SO₄ | removes the ~3 % of Pb²⁺ HCl left | (faint white PbSO₄) |
| 7 | Excess NaOH | Al(OH)₃ and Zn(OH)₂ are amphoteric | Fe(OH)₃ and Cu(OH)₂ precipitate |
| 8 | Dissolve in HCl, then excess NH₃ | Cu forms its ammine in the NH₃/NH₄⁺ buffer | deep-blue solution → Cu²⁺ |
| 9 | Fe(OH)₃ in HCl, then KSCN | FeSCN²⁺, K₁ = 1.0 × 10³ | blood red → Fe³⁺ |
| 10–11 | Acidify, excess NH₃, then aluminon | Al(OH)₃ precipitates near pH 9–10; Zn stays as its ammine | red lake → Al³⁺ |
| 12 | Na₂S into the solution | ZnS is insoluble | white ZnS → Zn²⁺ |
- mercury(0), black
- mercury(II) amidochloride, white
Worked example
Reading the observations
An unknown gives: 1: white precipitate with HCl. 3: the hot-water extract with K₂CrO₄ gives only a yellow solution, no precipitate. 4: the residue dissolves completely in ammonia. 5: acidifying brings back a white precipitate. 7: excess NaOH gives a red-brown precipitate. 8: dissolved in HCl and treated with excess ammonia, the solution stays colourless and the red-brown solid remains. 9: KSCN turns it blood red. 10–11: a white gelatinous precipitate, red with aluminon. 12: no precipitate with Na₂S. Which ions are present?
Concept check
Why is the group I chloride precipitate treated with hot water before ammonia?
Try the calculation
1.00 mL of unknown holds 0.10 mmol each of Ag⁺, Pb²⁺ and Hg₂²⁺. What is the least volume (mL) of 6 M HCl that converts all three into chlorides?
Key takeaways
- Qualitative analysis sorts ions into groups by solubility, separates them within each group, and confirms each with a specific test.
- Group I: HCl precipitates Ag⁺, Pb²⁺, Hg₂²⁺; hot water extracts PbCl₂, and ammonia dissolves AgCl while blackening Hg₂Cl₂.
- NaOH uses amphoterism to split Al and Zn from Fe and Cu; an NH₃/NH₄⁺ buffer turns Cu into its deep-blue ammine, precipitates Al(OH)₃ and keeps Zn in solution.
- Every conclusion — present or absent — needs a clear positive or negative result behind it.
Data and references
- G. Svehla, Vogel’s Qualitative Inorganic Analysis, 7th ed. (Longman, 1996).
- A. E. Martell & R. M. Smith, Critical Stability Constants (Plenum, 1974–1989), via D. Harvey, Analytical Chemistry 2.1, Appendices 10–12.
- W. M. Haynes (ed.), CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 97th ed. (2016): solubility of lead(II) chloride.
- N. N. Greenwood & A. Earnshaw, Chemistry of the Elements, 2nd ed. (1997): mercury(I) chemistry and precipitate colours.